Opinion
October 17, 1988
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Goldstein, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The plaintiffs served responses to the appellants' interrogatories within the time prescribed by a conditional order of preclusion. Although the appellants purportedly rejected the responses as inadequate, Supreme Court was not required to grant the appellants' subsequent motion for summary judgment (cf., St. Agnes Hosp. v Dengler, 131 A.D.2d 657). Moreover, we cannot say on the record before us that the court abused its discretion when it afforded the plaintiffs another chance to serve proper responses (see, Hoffman v Dickman, 115 A.D.2d 638). Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Spatt and Harwood, JJ., concur.