From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carr v. Hilton

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jul 1, 1899
28 Misc. 782 (N.Y. App. Term 1899)

Opinion

July, 1899.

Howard P. Okie, for appellants.

William R. Bronk, for respondent.


This judgment must be affirmed. The record presents no question of law, and on the sole question of fact litigated — whether the plaintiff or the plaintiff's father was the real party in interest — the justice found against the defendants. No injustice has been done, and following our settled practice, we shall not disturb his finding.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent.

FREEDMAN, P.J., and MacLEAN, J., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Carr v. Hilton

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jul 1, 1899
28 Misc. 782 (N.Y. App. Term 1899)
Case details for

Carr v. Hilton

Case Details

Full title:BENJAMIN J. CARR, JR., Respondent, v . HENRY G. HILTON and Mrs. HENRY G…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Jul 1, 1899

Citations

28 Misc. 782 (N.Y. App. Term 1899)