From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Plaintiff v. Her

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 9, 2011
No. 2:09-cv-0826 GEB KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:09-cv-0826 GEB KJN P.

August 9, 2011


ORDER


On August 5, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of this court's July 26, 2011 order denying plaintiff's motions for extensions of time to file a surreply. Plaintiff argues that he mistakenly believed that a surreply was an appropriate response to defendants' June 6, 2011 motion to strike. Plaintiff asks the court to grant plaintiff leave to file a proper opposition to defendants' motion to strike.

Review of defendants' June 6, 2011 reply reflects that defendants included motions to strike plaintiff's evidence to which defendants raised an objection (dkt. no. 121-1-2.) Thus, plaintiff is granted an opportunity to oppose defendants' motions to strike. Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). Plaintiff is cautioned that his filing is limited to the evidence to which defendants raised an objection. No additional filings in connection with the motion for summary judgment are permitted. The court is not inclined to grant additional extensions of time.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's August 5, 2011 motion (dkt. no. 140) is granted;

2. On or before August 29, 2011, plaintiff shall file his opposition to defendants' motions to strike; defendants' reply, if any, shall be filed seven days thereafter.

DATED: August 8, 2011.


Summaries of

Plaintiff v. Her

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 9, 2011
No. 2:09-cv-0826 GEB KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2011)
Case details for

Plaintiff v. Her

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR CARR, Plaintiff, v. H. HER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 9, 2011

Citations

No. 2:09-cv-0826 GEB KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2011)