From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carr v. Cleveland Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 4, 1947
148 Ohio St. 408 (Ohio 1947)

Opinion

No. 31029

Decided June 4, 1947.

Supreme Court — Dismissal sua sponte — No debatable constitutional question involved — Judgments — Cognovit note, executed December 29, 1934, secured by second mortgage — Reciting no action be brought within three years — Foreclosure action by first mortgagee — Answer of second mortgagee — Setting forth his mortgage — Asking for finding of amount due him and declaration of second lien — And, if sale, payment — Foreclosure decree, April 2, 1937 — Finding amount due second mortgagee and declaring his lien — Proceeds of sale exhausted by first mortgage — Sale confirmed June 7, 1937 — No execution by second mortgagee — Second mortgagee, in separate action, obtained cognovit judgment, July 22, 1938 — Certificates of judgment, July 23, 1938, and June 24, 1943 — Executions issued August 4, 1938, March 2 and August 9, 1944 — Claim that executions were "paper" — Separate action by second mortgagor, August 12, 1944 — To declare foreclosure decree and cognovit judgment unenforceable — Judgment for second mortgagor — Finding that Section 11663-1, General Code, applied — Affirmance by Court of Appeals.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga county.

Mr. Lex Kintner, for appellees.

Messrs. Todd Todd, for appellant.



It is ordered and adjudged, sua sponte, that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., TURNER, MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN, SOHNGEN and STEWART, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Carr v. Cleveland Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 4, 1947
148 Ohio St. 408 (Ohio 1947)
Case details for

Carr v. Cleveland Trust Co.

Case Details

Full title:CARR ET AL., APPELLEES v. THE CLEVELAND TRUST CO., APPELLANT

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jun 4, 1947

Citations

148 Ohio St. 408 (Ohio 1947)
74 N.E.2d 271

Citing Cases

Metro. Life Ins. v. Triskett Ill., Inc.

The right to judgment on a note evidencing the debt secured by a mortgage and the right to foreclose on the…

Brown v. Jensen

Especially does he know the risk where he takes, as was done here, a second trust deed. [8] It is true that…