From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

CARR v. CATE

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 22, 2011
CASE NO. 1:08-cv-01931-LJO-GBC (PC) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:08-cv-01931-LJO-GBC (PC).

April 22, 2011


ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR MODIFICATION OF SCHEDULING ORDER (ECF No. 44) DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS DUE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS


Plaintiff Orrin Carr ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 15, 2011, Defendants filed a Motion for Modification of Scheduling Order requesting additional time to file dispositive motions. (ECF No. 44.) Defendants state that such additional time is necessary to allow them an opportunity to access Plaintiff's prison file and complete a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff has not filed any pleading related to this Motion.

For good cause shown, Defendant's Motion for Modification of Scheduling Order is GRANTED. Dispositive motions shall be filed within thirty days.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

CARR v. CATE

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 22, 2011
CASE NO. 1:08-cv-01931-LJO-GBC (PC) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2011)
Case details for

CARR v. CATE

Case Details

Full title:ORRIN CARR Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW CATE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 22, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 1:08-cv-01931-LJO-GBC (PC) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2011)