From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carr v. Cal. Dep't of Corrs. & Rehab.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 21, 2021
1:17-cv-01769-DAD-SAB (E.D. Cal. Dec. 21, 2021)

Opinion

1:17-cv-01769-DAD-SAB

12-21-2021

CLAUDE CARR, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(A) (ECF NO. 95)

On December 20, 2021, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing this action with prejudice and with each party to bear its own costs and fees. (ECF No. 95.) In light of the stipulation of the parties pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), this action is terminated by operation of law, Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs of attorneys' fees.

Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Carr v. Cal. Dep't of Corrs. & Rehab.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 21, 2021
1:17-cv-01769-DAD-SAB (E.D. Cal. Dec. 21, 2021)
Case details for

Carr v. Cal. Dep't of Corrs. & Rehab.

Case Details

Full title:CLAUDE CARR, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 21, 2021

Citations

1:17-cv-01769-DAD-SAB (E.D. Cal. Dec. 21, 2021)