From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carpenter v. Swinerton-McClure-Vinnell

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 18, 1945
150 F.2d 404 (9th Cir. 1945)

Opinion

No. 10839.

May 18, 1945.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of California, Central Division, Paul J. McCormick, Judge.

Henry T. Moore, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants.

Charles H. Carr, U.S. Atty. and Ronald Walker, Asst. U.S. Atty., both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees.

Before GARRECHT, DENMAN, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.


Upon consideration of the transcript of record, briefs filed by respective parties, and oral arguments, it is ordered that the judgment of the said District Court in this cause be affirmed in all respects except as to the last three months of Edward P. Johnson's employment, and as to said last three months' employment the said judgment be reversed, that a judgment be filed and entered accordingly and that the mandate of this court in this cause issue as proved in Rule 28.


Summaries of

Carpenter v. Swinerton-McClure-Vinnell

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 18, 1945
150 F.2d 404 (9th Cir. 1945)
Case details for

Carpenter v. Swinerton-McClure-Vinnell

Case Details

Full title:T.E. CARPENTER and Edward P. Johnson, Appellants, v…

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: May 18, 1945

Citations

150 F.2d 404 (9th Cir. 1945)

Citing Cases

Schmidt v. First Nat. Bank

He is left to pursue his remedy the same as if no garnishment suit had been brought. Rood, Garnishment, §…

F. N. Phillips Co. v. Gay's Express, Inc.

2. The parol evidence rule is one of substantive law and not evidence merely, Noyes v. Evans, 6 Vt. 628,…