From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caronia v. Hustedt Chevrolet, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Oct 30, 2009
Civil Action No. 05-3526 (DRH) (MLO) (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 30, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-3526 (DRH) (MLO).

October 30, 2009


ORDER


Presently before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Michael L. Orenstein, dated and filed October 5, 2009, recommending that plaintiff's application for preliminary injunctive relief be denied. No objections have been filed.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72, this Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation for clear error, and finding none, now concurs in both its reasoning and its result. Accordingly, this Court adopts the October 5, 2009 Report and Recommendation of Judge Orenstein as if set forth herein. Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunctive relief is hereby denied.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Caronia v. Hustedt Chevrolet, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Oct 30, 2009
Civil Action No. 05-3526 (DRH) (MLO) (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 30, 2009)
Case details for

Caronia v. Hustedt Chevrolet, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPHINE CARONIA, Plaintiff v. HUSTEDT CHEVROLET, INC., et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Oct 30, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 05-3526 (DRH) (MLO) (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 30, 2009)

Citing Cases

Flawless Style LLC v. Saadia Grp.

As Defendant concedes, in the face of Plaintiffs' supposed breaches, Defendant elected to continue, rather…