From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caro-Quintero v. Entzel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 29, 2020
No. EDCV 17-1307-SVW (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2020)

Opinion

No. EDCV 17-1307-SVW (AGR)

04-29-2020

MIGUEL ANGEL CARO-QUINTERO, Petitioner, v. CYNTHIA ENTZEL, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire file de novo, including the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation. No objections to the Report have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and dismissing this action with prejudice. DATED: April 29, 2020

/s/_________

STEPHEN V. WILSON

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Caro-Quintero v. Entzel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 29, 2020
No. EDCV 17-1307-SVW (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2020)
Case details for

Caro-Quintero v. Entzel

Case Details

Full title:MIGUEL ANGEL CARO-QUINTERO, Petitioner, v. CYNTHIA ENTZEL, Warden…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 29, 2020

Citations

No. EDCV 17-1307-SVW (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2020)