holding change of counsel was not an “exceptional circumstance” where motion to suppress was filed three months after due date and information necessary for motion had been available to original counsel when motion due
Summary of this case from Davis v. StateNo. 47, 2007.
August 7, 2007.
Appeal from the Superior (Sussex) Cr 0605011039.
Decisions Without Published Opinions, Affirmed.
holding change of counsel was not an “exceptional circumstance” where motion to suppress was filed three months after due date and information necessary for motion had been available to original counsel when motion due
Summary of this case from Davis v. Stateholding change of counsel was not an "exceptional circumstance" where motion to suppress was filed three months after due date and information necessary for motion had been available to original counsel when motion due
Summary of this case from Davis v. StateFull title:Carney v. State
Court:Supreme Court of Delaware
Date published: Aug 7, 2007
Allowing otherwise would not promote efficient use of judicial resources and would result in prejudice to the…
State v. HamiltonKent County Criminal Case Management Plan at 5. Carney v. State, 931 A.2d 436, 2007 WL 2254543, at *2 (Del.…