Opinion
A22A0688 A22A0689
12-21-2021
MICHAEL D. CARNES v. CHANDRA PATTERSON.
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
These cases originated as a contempt petition from a divorce decree. On April 21, 2021, the trial court found Michael Carnes in contempt. Carnes filed a pro se notice of appeal from that order. On June 30, 2021, the trial court ordered that Carnes be arrested and incarcerated until the contempt was purged. On July 2, 2021, the trial court struck Carnes' notice of appeal from the April 21 order on the basis that Carnes was represented by counsel at the time of filing, which rendered the filing a nullity. See Romich v. All Secure, Inc., ___Ga.App. ___ (863 S.E.2d 179) (2021).
In Case Number A22A0688, Carnes appeals the trial court's order striking his notice of appeal from the April 21 contempt order; in Case Number A22A0689, Carnes appeals the July 2 incarceration order. We lack jurisdiction in both cases.
Carnes appealed these rulings to the Supreme Court, which transferred the matters to this Court. See Case Nos. S22A0177 and S22A0178 (Nov. 2, 2021).
First, the underlying action - a contempt petition from a divorce decree - is a domestic relations case, which requires compliance with the discretionary appeal statute. See Russo v. Manning, 252 Ga. 155, 155 (312 S.E.2d 319) (1984). Accordingly, Carnes' failure to file discretionary applications deprives us of jurisdiction over these appeals.
Second, the appeal in Case No. A22A0688 is moot. Although the trial court struck the notice of appeal, the case was nonetheless transmitted to this Court, and we dismissed the appeal. See Case No. A22A0359 (Oct. 19, 2021). Our dismissal acts as res judicata with regard to the merits. Howard v. State, 289 Ga. 207, 207 (1) (710 S.E.2d 761) (2011). There is thus no need for this Court to consider the propriety of the trial court's order striking the notice of appeal. See In the Interest of S. A. D., 345 Ga.App. 631, 632 (814 S.E.2d 775) (2018) ("It is well settled that appellate courts address only those rulings that may affect the proceedings below.") (punctuation omitted).
Carnes appealed this ruling to the Supreme Court, which transferred the matter to this Court. See Case No. S21A1287 (Aug. 24, 2021). We dismissed the appeal for failure to comply with the discretionary appeal statute. See Case No. A22A0359 (Oct. 19, 2021).
For these reasons, we lack jurisdiction to consider these appeals, which are hereby DISMISSED.