From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carnation Bldg. Servs. Inc. v. Henderson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Feb 1, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00703-CMA-MEH (D. Colo. Feb. 1, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-00703-CMA-MEH

02-01-2012

CARNATION BUILDING SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff, v. APRIL HENDERSON, and SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 105, Defendants.


MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Michael E. Hegarty , United States Magistrate Judge, on February 1, 2012.

Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint [filed January 31, 2012; docket #53] is denied without prejudice for failure to comply with D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A. The Court reminds the parties that it "will not consider any motion, other than a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 or 56, unless counsel for the moving party or a pro se party, before filing the motion, has conferred or made reasonable, good-faith efforts to confer with opposing counsel. " D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A (emphasis added). It is the responsibility of the moving party to "state in the motion, or in a certificate attached to the motion, the specific efforts to comply with this rule..." Id.


Summaries of

Carnation Bldg. Servs. Inc. v. Henderson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Feb 1, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00703-CMA-MEH (D. Colo. Feb. 1, 2012)
Case details for

Carnation Bldg. Servs. Inc. v. Henderson

Case Details

Full title:CARNATION BUILDING SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff, v. APRIL HENDERSON, and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Feb 1, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-00703-CMA-MEH (D. Colo. Feb. 1, 2012)