From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carnation Bldg. Serv. Inc. v. City & Cnty. of Denver

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 9, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00703-CMA-MEH (D. Colo. Aug. 9, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-00703-CMA-MEH

08-09-2011

CARNATION BUILDING SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, DEPARTMENT OF AVIATION, KIM DAY, RUTH RODRIGUEZ, APRIL HENDERSON, and SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 105, Defendants.


MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Michael E. Hegarty , United States Magistrate Judge, on August 9, 2011.

Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for a Stay of All Proceedings [filed July 7, 2011; docket #43 ] is granted. While the Court typically discourages stays of discovery, the Court acknowledges the efficiency and fairness of delaying the proceedings pending resolution of a motion to dismiss that could resolve this matter in its entirety. See Harris v. United States, No. 09-cv-02658-PAB-KLM, 2010 WL 1687915, at *1 (D. Colo. Apr.27, 2010) ("[n]either [the Court's] nor the parties' time is well-served by being involved in the 'struggle over the substance of the suit' when, as here, a dispositive motion is pending.") (citations omitted). "A stay of discovery pending the determination of a dispositive motion 'is an eminently logical means to prevent wasting the time and effort of all concerned, and to make the most efficient use of judicial resources.'" Chavous v. Dist. of Columbia Fin. Responsibility & Mgmt. Assistance Auth., 201 F.R.D. 1, 2 (D.D.C.2001) (citation omitted). As the pending motion to dismiss concerns the threshold issue of subject matter jurisdiction and may resolve this matter in its entirety, the Court finds good cause exists to impose a temporary stay until the District Court rules on the Motion to Dismiss (docket #38).

Accordingly, all proceedings in this matter are hereby stayed pending the adjudication of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. The parties are directed to file a joint status report within five business days of the District Court's order indicating what scheduling changes, if any, are needed.


Summaries of

Carnation Bldg. Serv. Inc. v. City & Cnty. of Denver

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 9, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00703-CMA-MEH (D. Colo. Aug. 9, 2011)
Case details for

Carnation Bldg. Serv. Inc. v. City & Cnty. of Denver

Case Details

Full title:CARNATION BUILDING SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Aug 9, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-00703-CMA-MEH (D. Colo. Aug. 9, 2011)