From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carmichael v. Chappius

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jan 31, 2019
14 Civ. 10012 (KPF)(AJP) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 31, 2019)

Opinion

14 Civ. 10012 (KPF)(AJP)

01-31-2019

BRIAN CARMICHAEL, Petitioner, v. PAUL CHAPPIUS, Respondent.


OPINION AND ORDER :

On September 13, 2018, the Court issued an Order in this case denying Mr. Carmichael's petition for a writ of habeas corpus. (Dkt. #55). On October 11, 2018, Mr. Carmichael filed a notice of appeal and a motion for certificate of appealability. (Dkt. #57-59). Respondent filed an opposition to the motion on October 31, 2018. (Dkt. #6). In his motion, Mr. Carmichael argues that the Court should grant a certificate of appealability for the Second Circuit to review this Court's findings that (i) there was a reasonable basis for the state court's analysis that Batson errors are not structural, and (ii) trial counsel's failure to present available arguments that the prosecution was striking Black prospective jurors based upon their race did not constitute ineffective assistance under Strickland's performance prong. The Court has reviewed the parties' submissions, and GRANTS Petitioner's motion on both issues.

SO ORDERED. Dated: January 31, 2019

New York, New York

/s/_________

KATHERINE POLK FAILLA

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Carmichael v. Chappius

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jan 31, 2019
14 Civ. 10012 (KPF)(AJP) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 31, 2019)
Case details for

Carmichael v. Chappius

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN CARMICHAEL, Petitioner, v. PAUL CHAPPIUS, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jan 31, 2019

Citations

14 Civ. 10012 (KPF)(AJP) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 31, 2019)