From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carmack v. Woolworth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 6, 1975
50 A.D.2d 516 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Opinion

November 6, 1975


Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 14, 1975, denying defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint on all proffered grounds except the claim of lack of personal jurisdiction (which issue was referred to a Special Referee to hear and report), unanimously affirmed. Respondent shall recover of appellant $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal. On the record before us, Special Term was justified in refusing to dismiss the complaint on the ground of forum non conveniens; or for failure to join the now adult son of the parties in the action (Schneider v Schneider, 17 N.Y.2d 123; Forman v Forman, 17 N.Y.2d 274.)

Concur — Markewich, J.P., Kupferman, Murphy, Lupiano and Nunez, JJ.


Summaries of

Carmack v. Woolworth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 6, 1975
50 A.D.2d 516 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)
Case details for

Carmack v. Woolworth

Case Details

Full title:ELIZABETH A. CARMACK, Respondent, v. ROBERT F. WOOLWORTH, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 6, 1975

Citations

50 A.D.2d 516 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)