Carlton v. Johnson

Full title: ADRIAN CARLTON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. M. JOHNSON, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Northern Division

Date published: Sep 15, 2006

Case No. 2:04-cv-001 (W.D. Mich. Sep. 15, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 2:04-cv-001.

September 15, 2006

ORDER

R. EDGAR, District Judge

On August 31, 2006, Magistrate Timothy P. Greeley submitted his report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), and W.D. Mich. LCivR 72.1. [Doc. No. 223]. The Magistrate Judge recommends that the following motions by plaintiff Adrian Carlton be denied:

1. Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment [Doc. No. 124];

2. Plaintiff's motion for injunction [Doc. No. 131];

3. Plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order and/or preliminary injunction [Doc. No. 147]; and

4. Plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order and/or preliminary injunction. [Doc. No. 159].

There are objections to the report and recommendation by the plaintiff. [Doc. No. 231]. After reviewing the record de novo, the Court concludes that the plaintiff's objections are without merit and are DENIED. The Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), and W.D. Mich. LCivR 72.3(b). Accordingly, the plaintiff's motions [Doc. Nos. 124,131,147,159] are DENIED.

SO ORDERED.