From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carlton v. Florida Citrus Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 28, 1978
356 So. 2d 1293 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

Opinion

No. 76-1424.

March 28, 1978.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Martin County, C. Pfeiffer Trowbridge, J.

Charles H. Damsel, Jr. and Marjorie D. Gadarian of Jones, Paine Foster, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellants.

Harry O. Thomas and Robert P. Murray of Holland Knight, Tampa, and Monterey Campbell of Dunlap, Coward Blakeman, Bartow, for appellees.


In the trial court, the appellants, Reuben W. Carlton, Mrs. Margaret Carlton, Wayne Carlton, Mrs. Margaret Talbot, and Ru-Mar, Inc., sought to enjoin the appellee, The Florida Citrus Commission, from enforcing its regulations which prohibit the appellants from marketing their citrus fruit as "Indian River" fruit. The appellants sought the injunction on grounds similar to those successfully asserted by the grove owner in Florida Citrus Commission v. Owens, 239 So.2d 840 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969). However, the trial court, as the trier of facts, found that appellants did not meet the requirements for injunctive relief set out in Florida Citrus Commission v. Owens, supra, and denied appellants' petition. We believe there is an adequate basis in the record to support the findings of the trial court. Accordingly, the final judgment is affirmed.

DOWNEY and ANSTEAD, JJ., and DAKAN, STEPHEN LEE, Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Carlton v. Florida Citrus Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 28, 1978
356 So. 2d 1293 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)
Case details for

Carlton v. Florida Citrus Commission

Case Details

Full title:REUBEN W. CARLTON, MRS. MARGARET CARLTON, WAYNE CARLTON, MRS. MARGARET…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Mar 28, 1978

Citations

356 So. 2d 1293 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)