Carlson v. Federal Communications Commission

Full title: Charles C. CARLSON, Appellant, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Feb 14, 1949

172 F.2d 766 (D.C. Cir. 1949)

Opinion

No. 9987.

Argued February 11, 1949.

Decided February 14, 1949.

Appeal from the Federal Communications Commission.

Mr. Philip M. Baker, of Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Charles E. Thompson, of Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. Richard A. Solomon, Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, of Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Benedict P. Cottone, General Counsel, and Max Goldman, Acting Assistant General Counsel, of the Federal Communications Commission, both of Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee. Mr. Dee W. Pincock, Attorney, Federal Communications Commission, of Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for appellee.

Mr. Vincent B. Welch, of Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Robert L. Heald, of Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for intervenor Louise C. Carlson.

Before EDGERTON, PRETTYMAN, and PROCTOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We find no error in the record. The decision of the Federal Communications Commission is therefore affirmed