From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carlson v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Mar 14, 2023
No. 16726-22S (U.S.T.C. Mar. 14, 2023)

Opinion

16726-22S

03-14-2023

DIANNE ELIZABETH CARLSON, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER

Kathleen Kerrigan Chief Judge

On July 29, 2022, the petition commencing this case was electronically filed. When a petition is electronically filed with the Court, the combination of the username and password of the individual efiling the petition serves as the signature of that individual. See the DAWSON User Guides on the Court's website,www.ustaxcourt.gov. The petition in this case was electronically filed using an email address belonging to dcarlson1@mindspring.com. Upon review of the entire record it appears that a representative of petitioner electronically filed the petition on petitioners' behalf. The Tax Court, unlike the Internal Revenue Service, does not recognize powers of attorney. It is well settled that, unless the petition is filed by the taxpayer or an individual who is lawfully authorized to act on the taxpayer's behalf, we are without jurisdiction. See Fehrs v. Commissioner, 65 T.C. 346, 348-349(1975). At this juncture, the email at dcarlson1@mindspring.com used to electronically file the petition will be deleted from the record.

The petition bears the signature of Dianne Elizabeth Carlson. However, the petition was not properly executed by her because the signature on the petition was made using a computer font which is not recognized by the Court as a proper signature. Thus, Dianne Elizabeth Carlson will be required to file a Ratification of Petition ratifying and affirming the petition filed to commence this case.

Therefore, in order for this Court potentially to acquire jurisdiction to consider this case, it is necessary to obtain a Ratification of Petition bearing petitioner's original signature and ratifying the petition previously filed. Upon due consideration and for cause, it is

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall make petitioner's service preference as paper in the record of this case. It is further

ORDERED that on or before April 26, 2023, petitioner shall file in paper form a proper ratification of petition bearing her original signature ("wet ink"), (not a photocopy), in which petitioner states, if such be the case, that they have read the petition filed on July 29, 2022, and ratify and affirms the filing of said document. Petitioner should note that the ratification may not be filed electronically. Failure to comply with this Order may result in the dismissal of this case for lack of jurisdiction. It is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to attach to this Order a form that petitioners may use to comply with this Order. It is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to attach to the copy of this Order the Court's Q&As on the subject "Representing a Taxpayer Before the U.S. Tax Court".

The Court encourages all litigants to register for DAWSON (Docket Access Within a Secure Online Network),the U.S. Tax Court's electronic filing and case management system. By registering, litigants may electronically file and view documents in their Tax Court case. If you currently file in paper or receive paper service from the Court, petitioners and not power of attorneys must register for DAWSON by sending an email request to dawson.support@ustaxcourt.gov.

RATIFICATION OF PETITION

,___ have read the Petition filed with the Court on

___and do hereby ratify and affirm the filing of said document by affixing my signature hereto.

REPRESENTING A TAXPAYER BEFORE THE U.S. TAX COURT

The United States Tax Court, which is separate and independent from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), has certain requirements that must be met before someone can represent another person or entity before the Court. Unlike the IRS, the Court does not recognize powers of attorney.

Who can represent me in my Tax Court case?

• You may represent yourself or hire an attorney or other person who is admitted to practice before the Court. You will know that a person is admitted to practice before the Court because that individual will have a Tax Court bar number. All representatives who practice before the Tax Court are subject to the American Bar Association's Model Rules of Professional Conduct.

What if the person I want to represent me is not admitted to practice before the Court?

• If your representative is an attorney, he or she may submit an application to seek admission to the Court's bar. Upon admission, the attorney will be assigned a Tax Court bar number and can then represent you in the case.
• If your representative is not an attorney, that person can only be admitted to practice before the Court by taking a written examination given every two years and by meeting other Court requirements. Information concerning the application for admission and the Court's nonattorney exam may be found on the Court's website, www. ust axcourt .gov.

May I represent the estate or trust of a deceased taxpayer before the Court without hiring a representative?

• Yes, if you are a duly authorized fiduciary or representative of the deceased taxpayer. For example, a state court of competent jurisdiction may appoint an individual as an executor, administrator, or personal representative of a deceased person. If you are a fiduciary, you should file a "Motion for Substitution of Party and to Change Caption" and attach a copy of the state court-issued letters of administration or letters testamentary. The motion must hst the case name and docket number.

May I represent an incompetent or incapacitated taxpayer before the Court?

• Yes, if you are a fiduciary duly appointed under state law, such as a guardian or conservator. If you have been appointed to serve as a conservator or guardian of the petitioner, you may file a Motion to Substitute Party and attach a copy of any documents providing proof of your appointment. The motion must list the case name and docket number.

In the alternative, the Court may permit you to be recognized as petitioner's "next friend" by filing a Motion to Be Recognized as Next Friend stating:

1. that petitioner cannot prosecute this case without assistance;
2. that the person seeking appointment as next friend would like to be recognized as petitioner's next friend, he or she has a significant relationship with petitioner, and would represent petitioner's best interests;
3. that there is no other person better suited to serve as next friend; and
4. the names and addresses of persons (e.g., spouse, parent, or sibhngs) who may have an interest in this matter.
You must include as an attachment to the motion a current statement from the petitioner's personal physician (or equivalent support) indicating that the petitioner is not competent to prosecute his or her case without assistance. You must also state in the motion whether anyone is known to have an objection to the Court's recognition of you as the petitioner's next friend. The motion must list the case name and docket number.

Please visit the Court's website, www.ustaxcourt.gov , for additional resources and information.


Summaries of

Carlson v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Mar 14, 2023
No. 16726-22S (U.S.T.C. Mar. 14, 2023)
Case details for

Carlson v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:DIANNE ELIZABETH CARLSON, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Mar 14, 2023

Citations

No. 16726-22S (U.S.T.C. Mar. 14, 2023)