From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carlson v. Aristacare at Cherry Hill

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mar 22, 2024
256 N.J. 515 (N.J. 2024)

Opinion

088975

03-22-2024

Janet CARLSON and Maryann Farrell as Administrators Ad Prosequendum and Co-Administrators of the Estate of Russell Carlson, deceased, Plaintiffs-Petitioners, v. ARISTACARE AT CHERRY HILL, LLC, AristaCare, LLC, d/b/a, Arista-Care Health Services, Defendants-Respondents.


ORDER

A petition for certification of the judgment in A-001753-22 having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied, with costs.


Summaries of

Carlson v. Aristacare at Cherry Hill

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mar 22, 2024
256 N.J. 515 (N.J. 2024)
Case details for

Carlson v. Aristacare at Cherry Hill

Case Details

Full title:JANET CARLSON AND MARYANN FARRELL AS ADMINISTRATORS AD PROSEQUENDUM AND…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Mar 22, 2024

Citations

256 N.J. 515 (N.J. 2024)
310 A.3d 1243