From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carlos v. Hartley

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jun 3, 2011
CV 11-203-DSF(E) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 3, 2011)

Opinion


PULIDO CARLOS, Petitioner, v. JAMES D. HARTLEY, Respondent. No. CV 11-203-DSF(E) United States District Court, C.D. California. June 3, 2011

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          DALE S. FISCHER, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records herein and the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The Court approves and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

         IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying and dismissing the Petition without prejudice.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and the Judgment herein on Petitioner and counsel for Respondent.

         LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Carlos v. Hartley

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jun 3, 2011
CV 11-203-DSF(E) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 3, 2011)
Case details for

Carlos v. Hartley

Case Details

Full title:PULIDO CARLOS, Petitioner, v. JAMES D. HARTLEY, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Jun 3, 2011

Citations

CV 11-203-DSF(E) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 3, 2011)