From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carlock v. Lee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 10, 1992
188 A.D.2d 371 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

December 10, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard R. Silver, J.).


In this action arising from a vehicular accident in the Bronx, the trial court properly granted the motion to change venue to Dutchess County, where none of the parties reside in Bronx County (see, CPLR 503 [a]). In support of her cross-motion to retain venue in Bronx County, plaintiff was required to demonstrate that the convenience of material witnesses would be served by holding trial in that county, but failed to do so. Defendants' short delay in submitting a proposed order for the trial court's signature, attributable to their retention of new counsel, did not constitute an abandonment of their motion (see, 22 NYCRR 202.48 [a]; Levine v Levine, 179 A.D.2d 625).

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Wallach, Asch and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Carlock v. Lee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 10, 1992
188 A.D.2d 371 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Carlock v. Lee

Case Details

Full title:KATHY CARLOCK, as Administratrix of the Estate of JAMES E. LAKE, Deceased…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 10, 1992

Citations

188 A.D.2d 371 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
591 N.Y.S.2d 888