From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carlo v. Riverdale Ice Skating Rink, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 21, 1958
6 A.D.2d 1036 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)

Opinion

October 21, 1958


The defendant appeals from a Special Term order granting the plaintiff a preference for a trial for a day certain under the Rules of Civil Practice (rule 151, subd. 3). The preference was predicated upon the fact that the defendant's carrier is now in liquidation. While a broad interpretation of the rule or of the term "[in] the interests of justice" is desirable, it should not be used as a means of assuring the payment of a judgment by a carrier. The Special Term order is reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion denied on the facts and in the exercise of discretion.

Concur — Botein, P.J., M.M. Frank, McNally, Stevens and Bastow, JJ.


Summaries of

Carlo v. Riverdale Ice Skating Rink, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 21, 1958
6 A.D.2d 1036 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)
Case details for

Carlo v. Riverdale Ice Skating Rink, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SYLVIA CARLO, an Infant, by Her Guardian ad Litem, MOSES CARLO, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 21, 1958

Citations

6 A.D.2d 1036 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)

Citing Cases

Cohen v. Abolafia

In our opinion the circumstances do not warrant the preference in trial of this action over the many causes…