From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carling v. Peters

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Feb 3, 2011
10 Civ. 4573 (VM) (HBP) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 3, 2011)

Opinion

10 Civ. 4573 (VM) (HBP).

February 3, 2011


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


Defendant Kristan Peters has applied for an extension of time to respond to plaintiff Francis Carling's motions for sanctions (Docket Items 97, 106). The application is granted in part.

On February 1, 2011, defendant filed an emergency application for an extension of time to respond to these motions, which had return dates of February 8, 2011, and February 17, 2011 (Docket Item 110). By Order dated February 1, 2011, I denied defendant's application without prejudice for renewal on the grounds that her application was not accompanied by an affidavit or affirmation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746 (Docket Item 111). Defendant has since filed an amended application (Docket Item 117) and a declaration (Docket Item 112).

Defendant has requested that the return date for both motions be set for March 8, 2011, or consolidated for some other later date. In the interest of efficiency, I am consolidating the motions and granting defendant until February 17, 2011, to respond to both motions. This prejudices neither plaintiff nor defendant. I am reserving decision on whether to hold a hearing.

Dated: New York, New York

February 3, 2011

SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Carling v. Peters

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Feb 3, 2011
10 Civ. 4573 (VM) (HBP) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 3, 2011)
Case details for

Carling v. Peters

Case Details

Full title:FRANCIS CARLING, Plaintiff, v. KRISTAN PETERS, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Feb 3, 2011

Citations

10 Civ. 4573 (VM) (HBP) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 3, 2011)