From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carlin v. Carlin

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 10, 2005
895 So. 2d 532 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Summary

holding that a finding of entitlement to attorney's fees without setting the amount is a non-final, non-appealable ruling

Summary of this case from Morrison v. U.S.

Opinion

No. 1D04-850.

March 10, 2005.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. John P. Kuder, Judge.

E. Jane Brehany, Pensacola, for Appellant.

Patrick L. Jackson of Chase, Quinnell, McIver Jackson, Pensacola, for Appellee.


The denial of the appellant's petition to terminate permanent alimony is affirmed because the appellant did not preserve the issue of whether the trial court erred by considering parol evidence. The portion of the appeal challenging the non-final, non-appealable ruling that the appellee is entitled to trial level attorneys' fees and costs, without setting an amount, is dismissed. See Scullin v. City of Pensacola, 667 So.2d 215, 215-16 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); see also JB Investments, Inc. v. John B. Kane and Co., Inc., 805 So.2d 900, 900 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

ALLEN, DAVIS and BROWNING, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Carlin v. Carlin

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 10, 2005
895 So. 2d 532 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

holding that a finding of entitlement to attorney's fees without setting the amount is a non-final, non-appealable ruling

Summary of this case from Morrison v. U.S.
Case details for

Carlin v. Carlin

Case Details

Full title:Carl CARLIN, Appellant, v. Susan CARLIN, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Mar 10, 2005

Citations

895 So. 2d 532 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Citing Cases

Morrison v. U.S.

See Zampell Refractories, Inc. v. Welch, 61 So.3d 1160, 1160 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011); Zuberer v. Zuberer, 28…

Bac Home Loans Servicing LP v. Ridgway

We dismiss appellant's appeal as to that portion of the judgment awarding attorney's fees because the trial…