From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carlile v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jun 9, 2021
No. 5442-20 (U.S.T.C. Jun. 9, 2021)

Opinion

5442-20

06-09-2021

Robert Carlile & Janet Carlile Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent


ORDER

Maurice B. Foley Chief Judge.

On September 30, 2020, respondent filed a Motion To Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. On October 13, 2020, respondent filed a supplement to his motion. In his motion, as supplemented, respondent seeks to dismiss so much of this case as relates to a notice of deficiency for tax year 2017 on the ground that no notice of deficiency, no notice of determination concerning collection action, or any other notice of determination has been issued to petitioners for tax year 2017 that would confer jurisdiction on this Court. Although the Court directed petitioners to file an objection, if any, to respondent's motion to dismiss, petitioners failed to do so.

Upon due consideration, it is

ORDERED that respondent's above-referenced motion, as supplemented, is granted in that so much of this case as relates to a notice of deficiency for tax year 2017 is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Petitioners are reminded that so much of this case as relates to a notice of deficiency for tax year 2016 remains pending before the Court.


Summaries of

Carlile v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jun 9, 2021
No. 5442-20 (U.S.T.C. Jun. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Carlile v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Robert Carlile & Janet Carlile Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Jun 9, 2021

Citations

No. 5442-20 (U.S.T.C. Jun. 9, 2021)