From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carl v. Sun Printing and Publishing Association

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1916
175 App. Div. 948 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)

Opinion

November, 1916.


The defendant, upon advisement, should seek to avert or to minimize the harm that may flow from an article inaccurate in any part, and hence injurious. Hence, the article published after the libel in question may be plead and proven for that purpose, as well as to reduce punitive damages, if the plaintiff is entitled to prove the same, although on this appeal he contends that in the complaint he makes no such demand. Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs. Jenks, P.J., Thomas, Stapleton, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

Carl v. Sun Printing and Publishing Association

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1916
175 App. Div. 948 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
Case details for

Carl v. Sun Printing and Publishing Association

Case Details

Full title:PAUL CARL, Appellant, v. SUN PRINTING AND PUBLISHING ASSOCIATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1916

Citations

175 App. Div. 948 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)