From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carl v. Carl

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Southern Division
May 9, 2000
16 S.W.3d 759 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. ED76495.

May 9, 2000.

APPEAL FROM: MISSOURI CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. FRANCOIS COUNTY, HONORABLE JAMES E. PENNOYER, JUDGE.

Clyde C. Farris, Jr., Steven C. Hiotis, COPELAND, THOMPSON FARRIS, P.C., 231 S. Bemiston, Suite 1220, Clayton, Missouri, 63105, for appellant.

Eric C. Harris, 214 West Main Street, P.O. Box 246, Park Hills, Missouri 63601, for respondent.

Before Richard B. Teitelman, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and Sherri B. Sullivan, J.



ORDER


Claude Alvin Carl (Husband) appeals from the trial court's Judgment Pendente Lite entered in favor of Tamara Amalia Carl (Wife) in the parties' underlying dissolution action. Husband argues the court erred in imputing monthly income to him of $4,333.00, and in requiring him to pay temporary child support of $565.29 per month for the parties' only child based on that level of income.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and record on appeal. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of evidence. No error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only, explaining the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Carl v. Carl

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Southern Division
May 9, 2000
16 S.W.3d 759 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Carl v. Carl

Case Details

Full title:TAMARA AMALIA CARL, RESPONDENT, v. CLAUDE ALVIN CARL, APPELLANT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Southern Division

Date published: May 9, 2000

Citations

16 S.W.3d 759 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)