Opinion
February 21, 1995
Appeal from the Court of Claims (Weisberg, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the factual determination of the Court of Claims to the effect that the claimant's property is not now, and has never been, landlocked as a result of the taking (see, Van Valkenburgh v. State of New York, 131 A.D.2d 903; cf., Wolfe v State of New York, 22 N.Y.2d 292; Matter of County of Schenectady [Pahl], 194 A.D.2d 1004). Bracken, J.P., Sullivan, Miller and Goldstein, JJ., concur.