From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carilli v. City of Hartford

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jan 7, 1964
197 A.2d 73 (Conn. 1964)

Summary

In Carilli v. Hartford, 151 Conn. 703 (1964), the plaintiff appealed a decision of the Hartford Pension Commission to the Court of Common Pleas, arguing that the board wrongfully denied him a special disability retirement allowance.

Summary of this case from McFadden v. City of New Haven

Opinion

Argued June 7, 1963 reargued November 7, 1963

Decided January 7, 1964

Appeal from the action of the pension commission of the defendant in denying the plaintiff's application for a special disability retirement allowance, brought to the Court of Common Pleas in Hartford County and tried to the court, Lugg, J.; judgment sustaining the appeal, from which the defendant appealed to this court. Error; judgment directed.

Joseph J. Burns, assistant corporation counsel, for the appellant (defendant).

Elihu H. Berman, for the appellee (plaintiff).


The charter of the city of Hartford was amended in 1957 to provide a special disability retirement allowance, payable from the municipal employees' retirement fund, for employees, other than teachers, who suffer a permanent disability in the course of their employment which does not prevent them from engaging in any gainful employment. Hartford Charter, c. 17, § 3(f) (1961); 28 Spec. Laws 423. On February 1, 1960, the plaintiff, a member of the fire department, became so disabled. At the time, and thereafter, he had outside remunerative employment. He applied for a special disability retirement allowance. The city pension commission denied the application. The plaintiff appealed to the Court of Common Pleas, which sustained the appeal and remanded the case to the commission. The court, in effect, directed that the plaintiff's earnings from his outside gainful employment at the time of disability be included with his fire department salary in the computation of the amount of income which he was earning at the time he became disabled. The defendant has appealed from that judgment.

A revised charter for the city of Hartford was adopted in 1947. 25 Spec. Laws 36, No. 30. It created the municipal employees' retirement fund and a pension commission to administer it. 25 Spec. Laws 78, §§ 2, 3. Neither the 1947 act nor the 1957 amendment made provision for an appeal to the courts from the action of the commission. In the absence of such provision, the Court of Common Pleas was without jurisdiction to hear the case. Bartlett v. Rockville, 150 Conn. 428, 430, 190 A.2d 690, and cases cited. The appeal should have been dismissed.


Summaries of

Carilli v. City of Hartford

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jan 7, 1964
197 A.2d 73 (Conn. 1964)

In Carilli v. Hartford, 151 Conn. 703 (1964), the plaintiff appealed a decision of the Hartford Pension Commission to the Court of Common Pleas, arguing that the board wrongfully denied him a special disability retirement allowance.

Summary of this case from McFadden v. City of New Haven
Case details for

Carilli v. City of Hartford

Case Details

Full title:DOMINIC J. CARILLI v. CITY OF HARTFORD

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Jan 7, 1964

Citations

197 A.2d 73 (Conn. 1964)
197 A.2d 73

Citing Cases

Windsor v. Windsor Police Dept. Emp. Assn., Inc.

Even if we assume, without deciding, that (a), in including the police lieutenant in the bargaining unit, the…

McFadden v. City of New Haven

The plaintiff finally argues that the letter which was sent to the CERF Board adequately notified the City as…