From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caril v. Jackson

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Aug 15, 2024
2:23-cv-01735-RSM-GJL (W.D. Wash. Aug. 15, 2024)

Opinion

2:23-cv-01735-RSM-GJL

08-15-2024

LEON CARIL II, Petitioner, v. ROBERT JACKSON, Respondent.


ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CONTINUE STAY

Grady J. Leupold United States Magistrate Judge

This matter is before the Court on referral from the District Court and on Petitioner Leon Caril II's Motion for an extension of time, construed by the Court as a Motion to continue the stay of his federal habeas action filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Dkt. 27.

On April 8, 2024, the Court entered an Order directing service of the habeas Petition, but also directing Respondent to respond only to the question of whether Petitioner has exhausted his state court remedies as required for a § 2254 Petition. Dkt. 22. On April 12, 2024, Respondent filed a Response indicating that Petitioner has not exhausted his state court remedies prior to filing the § 2254 petition. Dkt. 24. Petitioner did not file a reply to the Response. See Dkt. Thereafter, on May 15, 2024, the Court entered an Order staying the case and directing Petitioner to file a status report every 90 days informing the Court of the status of his state court proceedings. Dkt. 25.

On July 23, 2024, Petitioner filed the instant Motion. Dkt. 27. In the Motion, Petitioner indicates that his proceedings remain pending in state court and requests that the Court continue the stay of these habeas proceedings until the completion of those state court proceedings. Id. Respondent has not responded to Petitioner's Motion. See Dkt.

This Court may stay consideration of a habeas petition to allow a petitioner to exhaust his remedies in state court before returning to federal court. See Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 69, 27479 (2005). Because Petitioner is still exhausting his state court remedies, the Court finds good cause to grant Petitioner's Motion. Thus, the Motion to continue the stay (Dkt. 27) is GRANTED and the case shall remain STAYED.

Respondent is directed to FILE a report every 90 days informing the Court of the status of Petitioner's state court proceedings. The first status report is due on or before November 15, 2024, and shall include the state court cause number(s). If the state court dismisses or resolves Petitioner's state court proceedings, Petitioner or Respondent is directed to INFORM the Court and FILE a motion to lift the stay within 30 days of the state court taking such action.

Respondent shall FILE its answer within 45 days after the stay is lifted.


Summaries of

Caril v. Jackson

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Aug 15, 2024
2:23-cv-01735-RSM-GJL (W.D. Wash. Aug. 15, 2024)
Case details for

Caril v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:LEON CARIL II, Petitioner, v. ROBERT JACKSON, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Aug 15, 2024

Citations

2:23-cv-01735-RSM-GJL (W.D. Wash. Aug. 15, 2024)