From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carey v. Richardson

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Jul 14, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO 2:15cv206-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Jul. 14, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO 2:15cv206-MHT (WO)

07-14-2015

CARLOS CAREY, Plaintiff, v. SGT. RICHARDSON, et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered on this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows:

(1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (doc. no. 18) is adopted.

(2) This lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute.

It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue.

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

This case is closed.

DONE, this the 14th day of July, 2015.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Carey v. Richardson

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Jul 14, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO 2:15cv206-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Jul. 14, 2015)
Case details for

Carey v. Richardson

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS CAREY, Plaintiff, v. SGT. RICHARDSON, et al., Defendants.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 14, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO 2:15cv206-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Jul. 14, 2015)