From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carey v. Johnson

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 8, 2008
Civil Action No. 06-1578 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 8, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-1578.

January 8, 2008


MEMORANDUM ORDER


On November 27, 2006, the above captioned case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrate Judges.

On September 12, 2007, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction (doc. no. 23). On December 3, 2007, Magistrate Judge Lenihan issued a Report and Recommendation (doc. no. 26) recommending that the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction be denied. The parties were advised that they had ten days to file objections with the District Court. No objections have been filed.

After de novo review of the record in the case, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 8th day of January, 2008;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction (doc. no. 23) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation dated December 23, 2007 (doc. no. 26) is ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court.


Summaries of

Carey v. Johnson

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 8, 2008
Civil Action No. 06-1578 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 8, 2008)
Case details for

Carey v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:DUWAYNE CAREY, Plaintiff, v. BARRY JOHNSON; LT. BIRKHIMER; and ELEANOR…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 8, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-1578 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 8, 2008)