Opinion
Civil Action No. 11-259 (RMC).
July 29, 2011
ORDER
Plaintiffs in this matter move for a stay of discovery and Defendant opposes, instead requesting a three-week stay of discovery. This Court finds that the issues in this case are matters of constitutional law already established by the Supreme Court. Defendant has made no demonstration that the factual discovery they suggest will impact the constitutional considerations in this matter.
Therefore, it is ORDERED that discovery is stayed in this matter;
It is FURTHER ORDERED that parties will submit a joint proposed briefing schedule no later than August 19, 2011.
SO ORDERED.