From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

CAREY v. ELI LILLY COMPANY

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Aug 1, 2007
Civil No. 07-3191 (PAM/RLE) (D. Minn. Aug. 1, 2007)

Opinion

Civil No. 07-3191 (PAM/RLE).

August 1, 2007


ORDER


On July 30, 2007, Plaintiff Stephen Holdorf filed a Notice voluntarily dismissing without prejudice all claims against Defendant Eli Lilly and Company (Docket No. 2). Because Defendant has neither served an answer nor filed a motion for summary judgment and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(i), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The claims asserted by Plaintiff Stephen Holdorf are DISMISSED without prejudice; and
2. Each party shall bear its own attorneys' fees, costs, and disbursements.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

CAREY v. ELI LILLY COMPANY

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Aug 1, 2007
Civil No. 07-3191 (PAM/RLE) (D. Minn. Aug. 1, 2007)
Case details for

CAREY v. ELI LILLY COMPANY

Case Details

Full title:Ryan Carey et al., Plaintiffs, v. Eli Lilly and Company, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Aug 1, 2007

Citations

Civil No. 07-3191 (PAM/RLE) (D. Minn. Aug. 1, 2007)