From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carey v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
May 2, 2012
Case No. 11-11010 (E.D. Mich. May. 2, 2012)

Summary

noting that "while the ALJ generally only considers evidence from the alleged disability onset date through the date last insured, he may also consider later evidence to the extent it relates back the claimant's condition during the relevant period."

Summary of this case from Brady v. Soc. Sec. Admin.

Opinion

Case No. 11-11010

05-02-2012

VERONICA CAREY, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


HON. AVERN COHN


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 13)

AND

GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 10)

AND

DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 8)

AND

DISMISSING CASE


I.

This is a social security case. Plaintiff Veronica Carey appeals from the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner) that she is not disabled and therefore not entitled to disability insurance benefits. The matter was referred to a magistrate judge for all pretrial proceedings. Plaintiff and the Commissioner filed cross motions for summary judgment.

On April 11, 2012, the magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation (MJRR) recommending that the Commissioner's motion be granted, that plaintiff's motion be denied, and the case be dismissed.

II.

Neither party has filed objections to the MJRR and the time for filing objections has passed. The failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit Federation of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to object to the magistrate judge's report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the motions. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). However, the Court has reviewed the MJRR and agrees with the magistrate judge's well-written recommendations. Accordingly, the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court. The Commissioner's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is DENIED. This case is DISMISSED.

SO ORDERED.

______________________

AVERN COHN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to the attorneys of record on this date, May 2, 2012, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

Julie Owens

Case Manager, (313) 234-5160


Summaries of

Carey v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
May 2, 2012
Case No. 11-11010 (E.D. Mich. May. 2, 2012)

noting that "while the ALJ generally only considers evidence from the alleged disability onset date through the date last insured, he may also consider later evidence to the extent it relates back the claimant's condition during the relevant period."

Summary of this case from Brady v. Soc. Sec. Admin.
Case details for

Carey v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:VERONICA CAREY, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: May 2, 2012

Citations

Case No. 11-11010 (E.D. Mich. May. 2, 2012)

Citing Cases

Murnane v. Colvin

examined nor treated the Claimant during his period of insured status, he was not a treating physician and…

Brady v. Soc. Sec. Admin.

(Tr. 30.) Plaintiff's insured status did not expire until December 31, 2015 (Tr. 13), thus the ALJ was free…