From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carey v. Citibank

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Oct 8, 2019
ACTION NO. 4:19-CV-278 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 8, 2019)

Opinion

ACTION NO. 4:19-CV-278

10-08-2019

CARL CAREY, Plaintiff, v. CITIBANK, N.A., EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. TRANS UNION, LLC, and EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, Defendants.


JUDGE JORDAN/JUDGE JOHNSON

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On September 17, 2019, the Magistrate Judge entered proposed findings of fact and recommendations (Dkt. #22) that Defendant Citibank, N.A.'s ("Citibank") Motion to Compel Arbitration (Dkt. #14) be granted.

Having received the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no timely objections being filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

Accordingly, Citibank's Motion to Compel Arbitration (Dkt. #14) is hereby GRANTED, and this case is STAYED pending resolution of the arbitration proceeding.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 8th day of October, 2019.

/s/_________

SEAN D. JORDAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Carey v. Citibank

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Oct 8, 2019
ACTION NO. 4:19-CV-278 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 8, 2019)
Case details for

Carey v. Citibank

Case Details

Full title:CARL CAREY, Plaintiff, v. CITIBANK, N.A., EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS…

Court:United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 8, 2019

Citations

ACTION NO. 4:19-CV-278 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 8, 2019)