From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carey v. Allison

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 13, 2013
Case No. CV 11-5780 VAP (JCG) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 13, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. CV 11-5780 VAP (JCG)

11-13-2013

HAROLD S. CAREY, Petitioner, v. KATHLEEN ALLISON, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND

DENYING CERTIFICATE OF

APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and the remaining record. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted;
2. Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice; and
3. The Clerk serve copies of this Order on the parties.

Additionally, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253; Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003). Thus, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability.

________________________

HON. VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Carey v. Allison

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 13, 2013
Case No. CV 11-5780 VAP (JCG) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 13, 2013)
Case details for

Carey v. Allison

Case Details

Full title:HAROLD S. CAREY, Petitioner, v. KATHLEEN ALLISON, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 13, 2013

Citations

Case No. CV 11-5780 VAP (JCG) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 13, 2013)