From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Careathers v. Booth

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Aug 31, 2022
1:22-cv-146 (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 31, 2022)

Opinion

1:22-cv-146

08-31-2022

GRADY J. CAREATHERS, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER BOOTH and OFFICER CARSON, Defendants.


Susan K. Lee, Magistrate Judge.

JUDGMENT ORDER

TRAVIS R. MCDONOUGH, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion filed contemporaneously with this Order, Plaintiff's pro se complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is DISMISSED pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Because the Court CERTIFIED in the Memorandum Opinion that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, Plaintiff is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis on any subsequent appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Careathers v. Booth

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Aug 31, 2022
1:22-cv-146 (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 31, 2022)
Case details for

Careathers v. Booth

Case Details

Full title:GRADY J. CAREATHERS, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER BOOTH and OFFICER CARSON…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee

Date published: Aug 31, 2022

Citations

1:22-cv-146 (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 31, 2022)