From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carducci v. Russell

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 27, 2016
135 A.D.3d 887 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

01-27-2016

Antonio CARDUCCI, appellant, v. Robert RUSSELL, et al., respondents, et al., defendants.

Brian R. Hoch, White Plains, N.Y., for appellant. Peter J. Constantine, Yonkers, N.Y., for respondents.


Brian R. Hoch, White Plains, N.Y., for appellant.

Peter J. Constantine, Yonkers, N.Y., for respondents.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Jamieson, J.), dated December 19, 2014, which, inter alia, denied his motion for leave to renew and reargue his opposition to that branch of the prior motion of the defendants Robert Russell and Lisa Russell which was pursuant to CPLR 3012(b) to dismiss the action insofar as asserted against them, which had been granted in an order of the same court dated March 19, 2013.

ORDERED that the appeal from so much of the order dated December 19, 2014, as denied that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was for leave to reargue is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument; and it is further, ORDERED that the order dated December 19, 2014, is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,

ORDERED that one bill of costs is awarded to the defendants Robert Russell and Lisa Russell.

The Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was for leave to renew his opposition to that branch of the prior motion of the defendants Robert Russell and Lisa Russell which was pursuant to CPLR 3012(b) to dismiss the action insofar as asserted against them. The plaintiff failed to offer a reasonable justification as to why the new evidence submitted in support of the motion was not submitted in opposition to the prior motion. In any event, the newly submitted evidence would not have changed the prior determination (see CPLR 2221[e] ; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Rooney 132 A.D.3d 980, 982–983, 19 N.Y.S.3d 543 ; Wells Fargo Bank v. Allen, 130 A.D.3d 717, 718, 11 N.Y.S.3d 876 ).

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit.

RIVERA, J.P., DICKERSON, MALTESE and LaSALLE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Carducci v. Russell

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 27, 2016
135 A.D.3d 887 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Carducci v. Russell

Case Details

Full title:Antonio CARDUCCI, appellant, v. Robert RUSSELL, et al., respondents, et…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 27, 2016

Citations

135 A.D.3d 887 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
23 N.Y.S.3d 583