From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carducci v. Bensimon

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 12, 2014
115 A.D.3d 693 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-03-12

Antonio CARDUCCI, appellant, v. Abbe Sohne BENSIMON, respondent, et al., defendant.

Brian R. Hoch, White Plains, N.Y., for appellant. Kaye Scholer LLP, New York, N.Y. (Nicholas C. Friedman of counsel), for respondent.


Brian R. Hoch, White Plains, N.Y., for appellant. Kaye Scholer LLP, New York, N.Y. (Nicholas C. Friedman of counsel), for respondent.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Tolbert, J.), entered March 23, 2012, which granted the motion of the defendant Abbe Sohne Bensimon for leave to amend her answer.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the motion of the defendant Abbe Sohne Bensimon for leave to amend her answer, as the proposed amended answer did not result in any prejudice or surprise and was not palpably insufficient or patently devoid of merit ( see CPLR 3025[b]; HSBC Bank v. Picarelli, 110 A.D.3d 1031, 974 N.Y.S.2d 90; Maldonado v. Newport Gardens, Inc., 91 A.D.3d 731, 937 N.Y.S.2d 260). MASTRO, J.P., COHEN, MILLER and HINDS–RADIX, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Carducci v. Bensimon

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 12, 2014
115 A.D.3d 693 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Carducci v. Bensimon

Case Details

Full title:Antonio CARDUCCI, appellant, v. Abbe Sohne BENSIMON, respondent, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 12, 2014

Citations

115 A.D.3d 693 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
115 A.D.3d 693
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 1569

Citing Cases

Coleman v. Worster

Accordingly, where, as here, a plaintiff opposes a motion for leave to amend an answer so as to add a…