From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cardoso v. J. Soto

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Dec 30, 2014
ED CV 14-1392 BRO (MRW) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 30, 2014)

Opinion

          Joel Leal Cardoso, Petitioner, Pro se, Lancaster, CA.

          For J Soto, Warden, Respondent: Angela M Borzachillo, CAAG - Office of Attorney General, San Diego, CA.


          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          HON. BEVERLY REID O'CONNELL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court reviewed the petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed any written objections to the report. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.

         JUDGMENT

         Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice.


Summaries of

Cardoso v. J. Soto

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Dec 30, 2014
ED CV 14-1392 BRO (MRW) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 30, 2014)
Case details for

Cardoso v. J. Soto

Case Details

Full title:JOEL SOSA CARDOSO, Petitioner, v. J. SOTO, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Dec 30, 2014

Citations

ED CV 14-1392 BRO (MRW) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 30, 2014)