From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cardona v. Walker

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 1, 2009
No. CIV S-09-1976 FCD DAD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-1976 FCD DAD P.

December 1, 2009


ORDER


On November 13, 2009, plaintiff filed a document styled "Objection." Plaintiff's document is difficult to decipher. Therein, he states:

On Nov 9, 2009 Plaintiff, a state prisoner in pro se, has file a objection to findings and recommendation were order within twenty day (20) Plaintiff herein request judge's analysis granted my request/with a extention.

Plaintiff is advised that this civil rights action was dismissed as duplicative and closed on November 3, 2009. Documents filed by plaintiff since the closing date will be disregarded and no orders will issue in response to future filings.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's November 13, 2009 document styled "Objection." is disregarded.


Summaries of

Cardona v. Walker

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 1, 2009
No. CIV S-09-1976 FCD DAD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2009)
Case details for

Cardona v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:MELECIO M. CARDONA, Plaintiff, v. JAMES WALKER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 1, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-09-1976 FCD DAD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2009)