From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cardinale v. City of Atlanta

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Mar 21, 2023
No. A23A1075 (Ga. Ct. App. Mar. 21, 2023)

Opinion

A23A1075

03-21-2023

MATTHEW CHARLES CARDINALE v. CITY OF ATLANTA.


The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

Matthew Charles Cardinale filed a complaint for declaratory judgment against the City of Atlanta. After the City failed to answer, Cardinale moved for default judgment. After a hearing, the trial court entered a default judgment against the City. The City filed a motion to set aside the default judgment, which the trial court granted. Cardinale then filed this direct appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction

"The grant of a motion to set aside a default judgment . . . leaves the case pending in the trial court below and is not a final judgment." Laff Lines, Ltd. v. Dimauro, 186 Ga.App. 24, 25 (366 S.E.2d 375) (1988) (emphasis in original). Because the order that Cardinale wishes to appeal is not a final judgment, he was required to comply with the interlocutory appeal procedure set forth in OCGA § 5-634 (b). See id. Cardinale's failure to comply with the interlocutory appeal procedure deprives us of jurisdiction to consider this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Cardinale v. City of Atlanta

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Mar 21, 2023
No. A23A1075 (Ga. Ct. App. Mar. 21, 2023)
Case details for

Cardinale v. City of Atlanta

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW CHARLES CARDINALE v. CITY OF ATLANTA.

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Mar 21, 2023

Citations

No. A23A1075 (Ga. Ct. App. Mar. 21, 2023)