From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cardiff v. David L. Vickers & Sons

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Aug 22, 2019
175 A.D.3d 958 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

543.4 CA 17–01394

08-22-2019

Donald CARDIFF and Diana Cardiff, Plaintiffs–Respondents-Appellants, v. DAVID L. VICKERS & SONS and David L. Vickers, Individually, Defendants–Appellants–Respondents. (Appeal No. 4.)

SAUNDERS KAHLER, LLP, UTICA (MERRITT S. LOCKE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS–APPELLANTS–RESPONDENTS. BOSMAN LAW FIRM, LLC, ROME (A.J. BOSMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS–RESPONDENTS–APPELLANTS.


SAUNDERS KAHLER, LLP, UTICA (MERRITT S. LOCKE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS–APPELLANTS–RESPONDENTS.

BOSMAN LAW FIRM, LLC, ROME (A.J. BOSMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS–RESPONDENTS–APPELLANTS.

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, TROUTMAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously vacated and the order entered December 10, 2015 is modified on the law by granting that part of the motion of defendants David L. Vickers & Sons and David L. Vickers, individually, for summary judgment dismissing the negligence cause of action and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Sestito v. David L. Vickers & Sons [Appeal No. 2] ––– A.D.3d ––––, ––– N.Y.S.3d ––––, 2019 WL 3954694 [Aug. 22, 2019] (4th Dept 2019).


Summaries of

Cardiff v. David L. Vickers & Sons

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Aug 22, 2019
175 A.D.3d 958 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Cardiff v. David L. Vickers & Sons

Case Details

Full title:Donald CARDIFF and Diana Cardiff, Plaintiffs–Respondents-Appellants, v…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Aug 22, 2019

Citations

175 A.D.3d 958 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
105 N.Y.S.3d 333