From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cardenas v. Solano Cnty. Superior Court Judge

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 6, 2022
2:22-cv-00922 DB P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00922 DB P

06-06-2022

JULIAN MARTIN CARDENAS, Petitioner, v. SOLANO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE, Respondent.


ORDER

DEBORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner, a pretrial detainee at Solano County Jail proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner has not, however, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required filing fee ($5.00). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a); 1915(a). Petitioner will be provided the opportunity to either submit the appropriate affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or submit the appropriate filing fee.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee; petitioner's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed; and

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district.


Summaries of

Cardenas v. Solano Cnty. Superior Court Judge

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 6, 2022
2:22-cv-00922 DB P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Cardenas v. Solano Cnty. Superior Court Judge

Case Details

Full title:JULIAN MARTIN CARDENAS, Petitioner, v. SOLANO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 6, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-00922 DB P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2022)