From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cardenas v. Edwards

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 27, 2021
2:19-cv-01066 MCE DB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-cv-01066 MCE DB P

09-27-2021

DANNY CARDENAS, Jr., Plaintiff, v. B.S. EDWARDS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims defendants violated his rights under the Eighth Amendment. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On March 10, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 23.) Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 10, 2021, are ADOPTED in full; and
2. Plaintiff s motion to vacate the judgment (ECF No. 22) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cardenas v. Edwards

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 27, 2021
2:19-cv-01066 MCE DB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2021)
Case details for

Cardenas v. Edwards

Case Details

Full title:DANNY CARDENAS, Jr., Plaintiff, v. B.S. EDWARDS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 27, 2021

Citations

2:19-cv-01066 MCE DB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2021)