From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cardenas v. Edwards

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 28, 2021
2:19-CV-0691-TLN-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 28, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-CV-0691-TLN-DMC-P

12-28-2021

DANNY CARDENAS, JR., Plaintiff, v. B.S. EDWARDS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's renewed motion for the appointment of counsel, ECF No. 70.

Plaintiff seeks appointment of counsel to assist him with a settlement conference. Plaintiff's request is moot because the Court has granted Defendants' motion to opt-out of the early Alternative Dispute Resolution process and no settlement conference has been set in this case. See ECF No. 69.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion for the appointment of counsel to assist with a settlement conference, ECF No. 70, is denied as moot.


Summaries of

Cardenas v. Edwards

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 28, 2021
2:19-CV-0691-TLN-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Cardenas v. Edwards

Case Details

Full title:DANNY CARDENAS, JR., Plaintiff, v. B.S. EDWARDS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 28, 2021

Citations

2:19-CV-0691-TLN-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 28, 2021)