From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Card v. U.S.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Dec 22, 2004
863 A.2d 821 (D.C. 2004)

Opinion

Nos. 94-CF-754, 94-CF-801 and 94-CF-1147.

December 22, 2004.

Before: WAGNER, Chief Judge; TERRY, SCHWELB, FARRELL, RUIZ, REID, GLICKMAN, and WASHINGTON, Associate Judges, and STEADMAN, Senior Judge.

Judge Steadman was an Associate Judge of this court at time of argument. His status changed to Senior Judge on October 18, 2004.


ORDER


On consideration of the joint motion of the parties to dismiss appeals, vacate panel opinion, and for immediate remand of the cases for entry of stipulated dispositions, it is

ORDERED that the motion is granted and these appeals are hereby dismissed and the matters remanded to the Superior Court for proceedings consistent with the motion. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the panel opinion published at 776 A.2d 581 (D.C. 2001) is hereby vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.


Summaries of

Card v. U.S.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Dec 22, 2004
863 A.2d 821 (D.C. 2004)
Case details for

Card v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:Javier CARD, Jerome Edwards, Jr., Antoine W. Rice, Appellants, v. UNITED…

Court:District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 22, 2004

Citations

863 A.2d 821 (D.C. 2004)

Citing Cases

Longus v. United States

O'Brien's statement that Napue requires that the prosecutor have “presented” false testimony relies on Card…