From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carcia v. U.S. Immigration Customs Enforcement

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Jun 1, 2007
04-CV-949S (W.D.N.Y. Jun. 1, 2007)

Opinion

04-CV-949S.

June 1, 2007


ORDER


Plaintiff has filed a Motion for Appointment of Counsel. (Docket No. 23.) Under the standards promulgated in Hendricks v. Coughlin, 114 F.3d 390, 392 (2d Cir. 1997) and Hodge v. Police Officers, 802 F.2d 58, 60-62 (2d Cir. 1986), this Court will deny Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel without prejudice at this time.

IT HEREBY IS ORDERED, that Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel (Docket No. 23) is DENIED without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Carcia v. U.S. Immigration Customs Enforcement

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Jun 1, 2007
04-CV-949S (W.D.N.Y. Jun. 1, 2007)
Case details for

Carcia v. U.S. Immigration Customs Enforcement

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS GARCIA, Plaintiff, v. U.S. IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. New York

Date published: Jun 1, 2007

Citations

04-CV-949S (W.D.N.Y. Jun. 1, 2007)